Home Volume: 5 , Issue: Supplement 1
A19 Developing Capabilities for the Care Sector Using Simulation-Based Education
A19 Developing Capabilities for the Care Sector Using Simulation-Based Education

Article Type: Education Article History
Abstract

Introduction:

The social care workforce must evolve to meet the changing needs of an ageing population, including increasing demand and delivery of homecare. Current training for home care workers is often theory-based, with homecare workers often feeling underconfident and lacking skills in some areas. Although simulation is widely used in healthcare for skill enhancement, it is underutilised in homecare training. This project aimed to explore the use of simulation-based education to upskill homecare workers to identify risks they may encounter in a client’s home.

Methods:

This study was a pre-post mixed-methods study. Two high-fidelity simulations were undertaken, one for home care workers and another for home care managers. The simulation sessions were conducted in an activity of daily living suite. Both simulations were pre-briefed, recorded and debriefed using the STOP 5 hot debrief model [1]. Pre- and post-questionnaires included demographics, the 10-item General Self-Efficacy Scale, a bespoke measure on confidence with caring and communicating with clients, and the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning questionnaire [2]. Descriptive statistics were undertaken on pre and post surveys, the debrief was transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis alongside open-text comments from the questionnaires [3].

Results:

12 carers and 8 care managers took part in the simulation sessions. Four themes were developed across the quantitative and qualitative findings. Two themes focused on the use of simulation within home care: “Is Aggie okay?” – Risk Identification and client care, and “We’re in for it here” – Showcasing the challenges and difficulties of care. The other two themes focused on participants’ views on simulation as a training method: “Understanding the proper role of a carer” – Benefits of simulation in training, and “Obviously, we’re in a role play situation” – Challenges in engaging in simulation.

Discussion:

Simulation helped promote client-centered thinking, critical reflection, and peer discussion. It was seen as a useful complement to theoretical training, especially in preparing new carers. However, challenges such as suspension of disbelief, stress, and organisational barriers impacted engagement. To enhance effectiveness and minimise learner anxiety, the study highlights the importance of realistic scenarios, pre-briefing, and debriefing to ensure psychological safety and skill transfer.

Ethics Statement:

As the submitting author, I can confirm that all relevant ethical standards of research and dissemination have been met. Additionally, I can confirm that the necessary ethical approval has been obtained, where applicable.

References

1. Walker CA, McGregor L, Taylor C, Robinson S. STOP5: a hot debrief model for resuscitation cases in the emergency department. Clinical and experimental emergency medicine. 2020;7(4):259–66.

2. Pence P. Student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning with virtual simulations. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2021;17.

3. Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Thematic Analysis. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2019. p. 843–60.

Díaz, Anderson, Hoffman, Alegre, Simon, Gomez, Villamizar, and Wade: Feasibility of using holograms as embedded participants (EP) in simulation-based education (SBE)

Introduction

The use of mixed reality in simulation-based education (SBE) has been on the rise in the healthcare field; however, elements of human interaction, such as communication, may be missing. The implementation of hologram technology, a type of mixed reality, allows learners to apply their nursing skills in a safe environment while practising communication skills.

Innovation

Holograms

Embedded participants (EPs) are role players (actors) in a simulation [1]. A tele-EP is not in the same physical location as the learners during a simulation and can be present in the form of a telehealth robot, tablet, hologram or live stream. When substituting for a simulated caregiver, tele-EPs have been referred to as ‘pop-up parents’ [2]. A hologram, conversely, is a projected three-dimensional image that can beam into a scenario or be pre-recorded and interact within the environment [3] (see Figure 1). The recorded video-like image has realistic pauses, based on natural conversation, allowing time for participant interaction. While the hologram technology currently does not include artificial intelligence (AI), the natural pauses and life-like projections mimic a live person. These images, in the form of a hologram, allow for simulation consistency without relying on actor availability (see Figure 2). With high-fidelity simulation and the use of a tele-EP, learners can demonstrate communication skills, behaviours and attitudes while conducting interviews and developing a plan of care [1].

‘Pop-up parent’ virtual tele-EP as a hologram
Figure 1:

‘Pop-up parent’ virtual tele-EP as a hologram

Participants interacting with the hologram.
Figure 2:

Participants interacting with the hologram.

Purpose/innovation

The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of a tele-EP as portrayed via a hologram.

Methods

Sample

A small convenience sample of prelicensure student nurses at a university of substantial size in the United States was invited to participate. SBE was a course requirement; however, participation in the completion of research surveys was optional. Inclusion criteria included active enrolment in a clinical practicum course.

Procedure

Following Institutional Review Board approval, students were recruited. Participants consented to the study during the pre-brief which included a report, information regarding the potential use of tele-EP and that the father in the scenario may be present. Participants were assigned to a tele-EP via a hologram. The Principal Investigator was not the faculty of record for the didactic course.

Simulation

A published and validated healthcare disparity-infused infant scenario [2] served as the simulation. An EP was added to augment the interaction with the parent. A structured debrief followed.

Evaluation

Demographics. Information collected includes gender identity, race, ethnicity, age, marital and parental status.

The Simulation Effectiveness Tool-Modified [4] (SET-M ). This tool explored learners’ perceptions of simulation effectiveness. The 19-item instrument evaluated students’ learning and confidence throughout the SBE. Participants scored the responses using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (do not agree) to 3 (strongly agree) [4].

Actions, Communication, Teaching in Simulation (ACTS). The ACTS Tool [5] is an objective way to evaluate EP contributions to the SBE. Actions were evaluated on a scale from 0 (inadequate) to 6 (outstanding). The instrument is valid and reliable with Cronbach’s alpha of .93 and Pearson’s R of .91 [5].

Data analysis

The SET-M [4] and ACTS Tool [5] were scored via the author’s directions. Descriptive statistics for quantitative and categorical data were provided.

Results

Demographics

The feasibility pilot subset included five students, who were blind to the type of tele-EP. Participants were 22 years of age (n = 4, 80%), mostly males (n = 3, 60%), Asian (n = 2, 40%), White (n = 2, 40 %) and Black/Afro-Caribbean (n = 1, 20%). The majority identified as Hispanic (n = 3, 60%). None were married or parents.

SET-M

The overall SET-M total mean was 49, and the individual subscales mean ranged from 2.6 to 3.

ACTS

ACTS Tool’s mean score was 26 for the tele-EP hologram. The lowest subscale mean score for interacting with participants was 4 (adequate).

What’s next

The results indicate that the tele-EP via a hologram was overall effective, and the initial evaluation resembles the evidence in the larger sample [2]; however, a small sample size affects the identification of significant relationships. Further research is needed to establish the practicality of using holograms as EPs in SBE.

Pros and cons of holograms in SBE

Educators may be able to enhance simulation scenarios by incorporating tele-EPs. Tele-EPs have the potential to enhance community engagement, providing opportunities for volunteers to interact with learners while being remote. A notable pro of the holographic tele-EP parent was the possible increase in the fidelity of the simulation scenario and the similarity of communication to that with patients in the clinical setting. However, there was a lack of ability of the tele-EP to be able to respond to learners due to being a recorded hologram without AI. Communication and interaction with the participant are important elements to maintain as they can potentially impact learning. Cons included the fiscal implication of technology-dependent scenarios and resources to sustain consistent elements in every SBE.

Further research is needed to see how holograms can affect learning. Interactions between participants and the tele-EP parent were adequate, but limitations occurred. However, future improvements with AI in such technology are promising. Future iterations may also improve the size of the technology.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The study team wishes to acknowledge the College of Health Professions for the use of its holoportation technology (https://healthprofessions.ucf.edu/rehabilitation-innovation-center/).

Authors’ contributions

DAD consented participants, collected data, analyzed data and wrote submission, MA edited and wrote submission, BH hologram preparation, edited and wrote submission, Student Research Team all contributed to the background and writing of the brief: JVA edited and wrote submission, EGS edited and wrote submission, AWG edited and wrote submission, AV edited and wrote submission, AW edited and wrote submission.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

None.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

IRB was obtained and all learners consented verbally prior to the SBE.

Competing interests

None declared.

References

1. 

Lioce L, Lopreiato JO, Downing D, et al Healthcare simulation dictionary. 2nd edition. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ publication 20-0019. September 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.23970/simulationv2 [Accessed 9 June 2022].

2. 

Linnell M, Walker A, Jackson J, Ng K, Todd A, Diaz D. The impact of virtual and live embedded participants on learner perception of simulation experience and interactions in a healthcare. Videocast presented at: Sigma Theta Epsilon Chapter Virtual Scholarship Day; April 5 2022; Orlando, FL. Available from: https://www.ucfsttithetaepsilon.com/sigma-theta-epsilon-virtual-scholarship-day [Accessed 10 June 2022].

3. 

Mavrikios D, Alexopoulos K, Georgoulias K, Makris S, Michalos G, Chryssolouris G. Using holograms for visualizing and interacting with educational content in a teaching factory. Procedia Manufacturing. 2019;31:404410.

4. 

Leighton K, Ravert P, Mudra V, Macintosh C. Updating the Simulation Effectiveness Tool: item modifications and reevaluation of psychometric properties. Nurse Education Perspectives. 2015 Sep–Oct;36(5):317323.

5. 

Sanko JS, Shekhter I, Gattamorta KA, Birnbach DJ. Development and psychometric analysis of a tool to evaluate confederates. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2016;12(11):475481.